{"id":1171,"date":"2022-12-02T17:58:29","date_gmt":"2022-12-02T17:58:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/?p=1171"},"modified":"2022-12-02T17:58:29","modified_gmt":"2022-12-02T17:58:29","slug":"sony-55-210mm-f4-5-6-3-the-budget-telephoto-lens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/sony-55-210mm-f4-5-6-3-the-budget-telephoto-lens\/","title":{"rendered":"Sony 55-210mm F4.5-6.3: The Budget Telephoto Lens"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;hello world double thumbs here the sony<\/p>\n<p>55 to 210f 4.5 to 6.3<\/p>\n<p>is a budget telephoto lens usually sold<\/p>\n<p>new for 350.<\/p>\n<p>i bought this example for 75 from a<\/p>\n<p>local camera store and<\/p>\n<p>this cheap telephoto lens is not known<\/p>\n<p>to have the best image quality<\/p>\n<p>but i think it is a good price or good<\/p>\n<p>value<\/p>\n<p>telephoto lens for someone who&#8217;s wanting<\/p>\n<p>to try out their first<\/p>\n<p>telephoto lens like myself and<\/p>\n<p>sony sells this as one of the kit lenses<\/p>\n<p>for their aps-c cameras and i<\/p>\n<p>really do think this is the best value<\/p>\n<p>telephoto e-mount lens<\/p>\n<p>let&#8217;s go see why i think that is<\/p>\n<p>[Music]<\/p>\n<p>and the first positive i&#8217;ll talk about<\/p>\n<p>for this lens is the price<\/p>\n<p>and yes the sony 70 to 350g<\/p>\n<p>lens is an upgrade in every single way<\/p>\n<p>it&#8217;s got a sharper image quality<\/p>\n<p>and it&#8217;s able to reach almost double<\/p>\n<p>the focal length and also it is weather<\/p>\n<p>sealed<\/p>\n<p>but for us non-professionals<\/p>\n<p>900 is a lot of money for a lens no it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>not it&#8217;s actually a bargain<\/p>\n<p>at 900 i mean the sony 100 to 400 gm<\/p>\n<p>lens that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>2500 so 900 that&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>that&#8217;s basically free<\/p>\n<p>so for us non-professionals the 55 to<\/p>\n<p>210 at<\/p>\n<p>a third of the price is an attractive<\/p>\n<p>choice and<\/p>\n<p>i know that the price of a new lens for<\/p>\n<p>this<\/p>\n<p>is about 350 dollars but you can easily<\/p>\n<p>find<\/p>\n<p>lenses for about 100 or less<\/p>\n<p>in the used market and there are three<\/p>\n<p>reasons why<\/p>\n<p>first is that sony sold a lot of these<\/p>\n<p>lenses as a part of the kit lens along<\/p>\n<p>with the<\/p>\n<p>sony 16 to 50 kit lens and secondly<\/p>\n<p>the lens has a bad reputation for having<\/p>\n<p>poor image quality so the price goes<\/p>\n<p>down quickly<\/p>\n<p>and it&#8217;s an old lens so it first came<\/p>\n<p>out in 2011<\/p>\n<p>so it&#8217;s all technology as i mentioned<\/p>\n<p>earlier i got this example for 75<\/p>\n<p>dollars from my local camera store<\/p>\n<p>that&#8217;s vintage lens price for a native<\/p>\n<p>e-mount lens that&#8217;s gonna<\/p>\n<p>auto focus and has stabilization built<\/p>\n<p>in<\/p>\n<p>i personally don&#8217;t use my telephoto<\/p>\n<p>lenses or telephoto field of view that<\/p>\n<p>often<\/p>\n<p>so spending nine hundred dollars for<\/p>\n<p>something i wasn&#8217;t going to use that<\/p>\n<p>often<\/p>\n<p>wasn&#8217;t the smartest choice but for 75<\/p>\n<p>dollars i&#8217;m really happy to have this<\/p>\n<p>lens in my camera bag<\/p>\n<p>that&#8217;s going to go twice as far as my<\/p>\n<p>sony 18 to 105 which is<\/p>\n<p>my longest reaching lens before i bought<\/p>\n<p>this lens<\/p>\n<p>and the second positive i&#8217;ll talk about<\/p>\n<p>is it&#8217;s lightweight<\/p>\n<p>and it&#8217;s small size and the compactness<\/p>\n<p>of the sony aps-c system is definitely<\/p>\n<p>one of its biggest strengths and<\/p>\n<p>the 55 to 210 is a small and light<\/p>\n<p>telephoto lens<\/p>\n<p>it&#8217;s only about 64 by 108 millimeters<\/p>\n<p>which is a lot lighter compared to very<\/p>\n<p>large full-frame telephoto lenses like<\/p>\n<p>the<\/p>\n<p>fv70 to 300g lens which is 84 by 144<\/p>\n<p>millimeters<\/p>\n<p>and even compared to the 70 to 350g lens<\/p>\n<p>that&#8217;s meant for aps-c<\/p>\n<p>it&#8217;s a lot smaller because it&#8217;s about<\/p>\n<p>77-142 millimeters<\/p>\n<p>and also weighs only about 345 grams<\/p>\n<p>which is a lot lighter than the 70 to<\/p>\n<p>350 g lens which is<\/p>\n<p>almost double at 625 grams<\/p>\n<p>or the fv to 70 to 300 g lens which is<\/p>\n<p>854 grams yes the g lenses are going to<\/p>\n<p>be superior in every<\/p>\n<p>way possible but this 55 to 210 is the<\/p>\n<p>only affordable<\/p>\n<p>zoom telephoto lens so the only<\/p>\n<p>comparison that you could compare it to<\/p>\n<p>it would be those g lenses and this is<\/p>\n<p>much lighter and<\/p>\n<p>much smaller than those two lenses and<\/p>\n<p>even if you look at the super zoom<\/p>\n<p>lenses like the 18 to 200<\/p>\n<p>this is still going to be cheaper<\/p>\n<p>lighter and<\/p>\n<p>better in terms of value and the third<\/p>\n<p>positive is the<\/p>\n<p>stabilization and stabilization is key<\/p>\n<p>in video making shaky footage makes<\/p>\n<p>people want to stop watching<\/p>\n<p>and buttery smooth gimbal dog videos<\/p>\n<p>make people happy<\/p>\n<p>despite being a cheap kit lens the 55 to<\/p>\n<p>210 has<\/p>\n<p>lens stabilization or sony&#8217;s optical<\/p>\n<p>steady shot<\/p>\n<p>and since most sony aps-c cameras do not<\/p>\n<p>have in-body stabilization<\/p>\n<p>the lens stabilization is a must and<\/p>\n<p>these hand jitters<\/p>\n<p>and shakes become more prominent at<\/p>\n<p>telephoto angles<\/p>\n<p>so the 55 to 210 optical steady shot<\/p>\n<p>makes a huge difference when making<\/p>\n<p>videos handheld as you can see the<\/p>\n<p>difference between the oss<\/p>\n<p>on and the oss off for<\/p>\n<p>55 to 210 is pretty noticeable even to<\/p>\n<p>a non-professional like me so now on to<\/p>\n<p>some negatives and the first negative<\/p>\n<p>would be that image quality<\/p>\n<p>and as one of the kit lenses available<\/p>\n<p>for these only aps-c cameras<\/p>\n<p>the 55 to 210 doesn&#8217;t have the sharpest<\/p>\n<p>image quality in my non-professional<\/p>\n<p>opinion<\/p>\n<p>i don&#8217;t think i would spot a world&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>difference if i view the 4k videos of<\/p>\n<p>the 55 to 210<\/p>\n<p>versus the 4k videos of 18 to 105 g lens<\/p>\n<p>on a smartphone screen but on a tv<\/p>\n<p>screen or a computer monitor screen the<\/p>\n<p>18 to 1005g<\/p>\n<p>lens produces a sharper and more<\/p>\n<p>pleasing looking image<\/p>\n<p>and this is the main reason why i<\/p>\n<p>haven&#8217;t used the 55 to 210<\/p>\n<p>much since i bought the 55 to 210 the<\/p>\n<p>182 105 has enough zoom range for me<\/p>\n<p>and has superior image quality with one<\/p>\n<p>of the best<\/p>\n<p>lens stabilization in the email world<\/p>\n<p>compared to<\/p>\n<p>a 50 millimeter f 1.4 prime lens the<\/p>\n<p>sharpness is a world&#8217;s difference the 55<\/p>\n<p>to 210 still will create more than<\/p>\n<p>usable 4k videos for youtube and on<\/p>\n<p>professional videos<\/p>\n<p>and it&#8217;s not like the 4k videos are<\/p>\n<p>gonna hurt your eyes<\/p>\n<p>in any way but because of its softer<\/p>\n<p>image i find myself<\/p>\n<p>gravitating towards other lenses more<\/p>\n<p>often than this one<\/p>\n<p>the second negative of this lens is its<\/p>\n<p>aperture and the 55 to 210<\/p>\n<p>is a darker lens with the aperture of<\/p>\n<p>4.5 to 6.3<\/p>\n<p>but it&#8217;s not alone because most<\/p>\n<p>telephoto lenses have<\/p>\n<p>high aperture like the 70 to 350g lens<\/p>\n<p>is also<\/p>\n<p>f 4.5 to 6.3 so<\/p>\n<p>at the max aperture of f 4.5 at 55<\/p>\n<p>millimeters and<\/p>\n<p>f 6.3 at 210 millimeters it doesn&#8217;t make<\/p>\n<p>this lens a great low light lens<\/p>\n<p>compared to a 50 millimeter f 1.4<\/p>\n<p>vintage lens the<\/p>\n<p>f 4.5 at 55 millimeter has noticeably<\/p>\n<p>more grain and it&#8217;s just not the quality<\/p>\n<p>that you expect from a bigger sensored<\/p>\n<p>camera but<\/p>\n<p>as long as there is enough light i like<\/p>\n<p>the bokeh you get out of this lens at<\/p>\n<p>210 millimeters it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>just not a lens you&#8217;ll bring out to the<\/p>\n<p>late night bird videos or<\/p>\n<p>low light indoor events and the third<\/p>\n<p>negative of this lens will be<\/p>\n<p>the build quality and i&#8217;m not an<\/p>\n<p>engineer but<\/p>\n<p>it does look likes only fuse two lenses<\/p>\n<p>to make a telephoto lens<\/p>\n<p>and it doesn&#8217;t have a zoom lock so you<\/p>\n<p>can push it out but you can also push it<\/p>\n<p>in very easily<\/p>\n<p>and considering it&#8217;s only a hundred<\/p>\n<p>dollars i<\/p>\n<p>really can&#8217;t complain but you can tell<\/p>\n<p>that this isn&#8217;t<\/p>\n<p>the most high quality or high priced<\/p>\n<p>lens so in conclusion the sony 55 to 210<\/p>\n<p>is a great budget telephoto lens for<\/p>\n<p>youtube videos<\/p>\n<p>there really isn&#8217;t an alternative for<\/p>\n<p>sony aps-c users looking to<\/p>\n<p>add a little bit more reach without<\/p>\n<p>spending 900<\/p>\n<p>or more and yes it&#8217;s not the sharpest<\/p>\n<p>not the brightest and not the most<\/p>\n<p>sturdiest but<\/p>\n<p>it&#8217;s a lens you can buy for less than a<\/p>\n<p>hundred dollars<\/p>\n<p>and it&#8217;s definitely not my most used<\/p>\n<p>lens it&#8217;s probably my least used lens<\/p>\n<p>but i&#8217;m happy to have it because<\/p>\n<p>of its low price and it the special<\/p>\n<p>purpose that it serves<\/p>\n<p>and i think the 16 to 50<\/p>\n<p>along with the 55 to 210 the kit lens<\/p>\n<p>combo<\/p>\n<p>could be all you need for most<\/p>\n<p>situations<\/p>\n<p>and i should probably compare the 16 to<\/p>\n<p>50 plus the 55 to 210 combo<\/p>\n<p>versus the 18 to 105 single<\/p>\n<p>lens setup to see which is the better<\/p>\n<p>setup<\/p>\n<p>but what do you guys think about the<\/p>\n<p>sony 55 to 210<\/p>\n<p>is it worth buying or should people stay<\/p>\n<p>away from it<\/p>\n<p>i think you should buy it especially if<\/p>\n<p>you can buy for less than a hundred<\/p>\n<p>dollars<\/p>\n<p>but let me know what you guys think down<\/p>\n<p>below and until next time<\/p>\n<p>[Music]<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;hello world double thumbs here the sony 55 to 210f 4.5 to 6.3 is a budget telephoto lens usually sold new for 350. i bought this example for 75 from&hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[562],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-deals"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1171"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1171\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1172,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1171\/revisions\/1172"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthnutritiontips.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}